The conference is committed to ensuring the principles of academic integrity, transparency, and good practices in scientific research. All authors, reviewers, and members of the scientific committee must adhere to internationally accepted ethical standards in academic publishing processes.

1. Originality and Plagiarism

Submitted papers must be original and unpublished.They must not have been previously published or be under simultaneous review in other conferences, journals, or collective works.

Plagiarism, self-plagiarism, text manipulation, or the improper use of third-party materials without proper citation constitute serious violations of academic ethics. All manuscripts will be subject to similarity verification using the Turnitin tool, in order to ensure the originality of the submitted works.

If plagiarism, duplicate publication, or unacceptable levels of academic similarity are detected, the manuscript will be automatically rejected.

2. Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence

The use of generative artificial intelligence tools (for example, writing assistance systems, text generation tools, analytical systems, or automated translation tools) must be carried out in a responsible, transparent, and ethical manner..

Authors must ensure that:

• Artificial intelligence does not replace intellectual authorship or academic responsibility of the work or article
• The Content generated with these tools is reviewed, validated, and corrected by the authors.
• Any significant use of artificial intelligence tools in the preparation of the manuscript is clearly declared by the authors..

Artificial intelligence tools cannot be listed as authors of the work or article

3. Responsible Authorship

Authorship of a paper must reflect only those individuals who have made substantial contributions to the research development, including the study design, data analysis, manuscript writing, or critical revision of the content.

All authors must approve the final version of the manuscript before submission and accept responsibility for the content presented.

4. Transparency and Conflicts of Interest

Authors must declare any potential conflict of interest that could influence the results or interpretation of the study.

If the research has received institutional funding, sponsorship, or external support, this information must be clearly disclosed in the final version of the article

5. Research Ethics

Papers involving human participants, sensitive data, or personal information must be conducted in accordance with the appropriate ethical research principles.

Authors must ensure that the research has respected the principles of:

• Informed consent
• Participant confidentiality
• Protection of personal data
• Respect for the dignity of research participants

When applicable, authors must indicate that the study was approved by an institutional ethics committee.

6. Responsibilities of Reviewers

Reviewers must evaluate manuscripts with objectivity, confidentiality, and academic rigor.

Information contained in manuscripts submitted for review must be treated as confidential material and must not be used for personal or academic purposes prior to publication.

Reviewers must refrain from evaluating manuscripts where a conflict of interest exists.

7. Responsibilities of the Scientific Committee

The scientific committee will ensure that the review process is conducted according to principles of impartiality, academic quality, and transparency..

Editorial decisions will be based exclusively on the scientific merit of the papers, their relevance to the conference, and their contribution to the field of study.